COVER

Table of Contents

EDITORIAL

COVER STORY

- United Colors of Jakarta

Reflections on the Asian-Latin American Lawyers' Conference

An Open Letter

COUNTRY SITUATIONS

 EAST TIMOR
- Confronting
 the past

 KASHMIR, INDIA
- Government cannot disregard human rights forever

Kashmir India - 
List of Disappeared

INDONESIA
 - After Suharto: A break in the cycle?

PHILIPPINES
- The parable of two streets

SRI LANKA
- Broken serendipity

THAILAND
- Wounded narratives


Excerpts from the Speeches and Paper Presentations Delivered During the Asian and Latin American Lawyer's Conference in Jakarta

Speech delivered Before the Asian-Europe People's Forum in South Korea
Between Memory and Impunity

STATEMENT
A Son's Disappearance: A Mother's Perseverance

FEATURE 
- Edcel Lagman:
A profile of courage

Contribucion Des De Latino America
FEDEFAM y AFAD unidas en Sola voz contra la desaparicion forzada

YEAR END REPORT



Country Situation
Philippines


The parable of two streets 
 

Katipunan Road in the town of Labangon, Cebu province is a usually busy street, with endless rows of vehicles treading along its slender, cemented path like like passing salmons in a narrow stream. Situated five kilometers away from the provincial capital, Katipunan could well be described as the epitome of life in the southern suburbs - busy, noisy and feisty, albeit unbereft of that genial rustic element that is so common in this part of the Philippines. Yet on the 11th of July 1985, this same stretch of land known for its clatter and humdrum suddenly fell silent, exuding a sense of the funereal as it huddled itself in its own eerie quietude.

For at 9 o'clock in the morning, a white Ford Cortina with a hard black top appeared along Katipunan, with two motorcycles trailing closely behind. As the small caravan halted in a nearby Sing-Along, armed men in civilian clothes alighted from the vehicles, donning assault rifles and hand-held radios. Around 3:45 in the afternoon, a man on blue motorcycle was noticed approaching Cabarrubias Street from Katipunan Road At that precise moment, the white Cortina swung around, blocking its path. As the two other motorcycle came from behind to complete the entrapment, armed hooligans surrounded the victim and cocked their M-16s, pointing their deadly nozzles at the surprised motorcyclist. Before shoving him inside the car, one of the assailants seized the man's bag and removed his crash helmet, revealing the muffled face of Fr. Rudy Romano - Redemptorist priest and anti-Marcos oppositionist. Shouting "Ang akong motor" (My motorcycle), Fr. Rudy beamed a confident smile, as he saw a number of bystanders witnessing his arrest. As it later turned out, that was to be the last strand of hope that was to be gleaned from him by the public eye.

Fifteen years and four administration later, Fr. Rudy remains officially missing; and neither his fate nor his whereabouts has been divulged by the military, by his abductors or by the intelligence community. Even up to this time, his disappearance has generated endless questions and speculations, turning a once-frantic search for a missing person into a motivating force for national introspection. As a member of the Catholic clergy and respected leader of the Task Force Detainees of the Philippines (TFDP), Father Rudy has since become a poignant symbol for all desaparecidos and a rallying icon for both defenders and advocates of civil liberties and human rights.

Used initially as a political tactic to silence the opposition against the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos, involuntary disappearance has since become the underlying legacy of the latter's corrupt administration. Starting with the abduction of militant student leader Charlie del Rosario in 1971, the number of disappeared has now exceeded the thousand-mark, and is expected to increase gradually for an indefinite period of time.

While disappearances may have been perpetrated under an erstwhile democratic regime, the declaration of Martial Law in 1972 clearly gave the military and other security agencies the legal cover in their punitive operations. Armed with near carte blanche authority, State agents arrested suspected dissidents at will, resulting in gross human rights violations including 759 reported cases of involuntary disappearance under the incumbency of then-President Marcos.


The Usual Suspects

Viewed from any angle, it is clear that the abductions were government reactions to the growing insurgency in both the urban centers and countryside. Faced with multiple armed challenges from the communist New People's Army (NPA) to the separatist Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and its various splinter groups, the government used disappearances to cajole the population and weed out potential rebels and sympathizers. In most instances, the escalation of armed conflicts is accompanied by intensified perpetration of abductions and disappearances, turning a savage guerilla war into a government campaign against its own people.

Consequently, a large portion of those who disappeared were or had been members of legally constituted sectoral and human rights organizations which the military claims to have direct links with the leftist underground or are sympathetic with communist cause. Among the targeted groups are peasant /farmer organizations like Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMU) / Peasant Movement of the Philippines) and labor unions such as the Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU) May One Movement). Other victims include ordinary citizens from all sectors of society who have been very critical of government policy and have voiced their criticisms in non-violent manner.

In recent years, the military has utilized more sophisticated means of emasculating the opposition - employing vigilante groups, militia units and paramilitary forces in their counter-insurgency operations. They have also devised paralegal means to corrode and weaken the insurgency's mass base by targeting open or legal non-governmental organizations suspected of being front groups for the CPP-NPA. Once identified, members of the said NGOs are subsequently subjected to stigmatization and "red-labeling", thus turning them into legitimate targets by counter-operatives.  Most often than not, they become the object of constant harassment and intimidation, while others become targets of physical abuse. In a majority of these cases, such practices are carried out by poorly trained and ill-disciplined members of the paramilitary. Though in total violation of their rules of engagement, abductions and other abuses have been committed with blind toleration (if not outright sanction) from military commanders, making human rights violations an intrinsic element in
government's anti-insurgency operation.

Based on existing records, the institutions that have been commonly implicated in such systematic wrong-doing are the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), the Philippine National Police (PNP), the now-defunct Philippine Constabulary (PC) and members of various militia organizations such as the Citizens' Armed Forces Geographical Unit (CAFGUs) and the Marcos-era Citizens Home Defense Forces (CHDF).

The pattern of involvement was even verified by the United nations Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearance (UNWGEID) through a report that was released in 1991. In the said document, the Group asserted that, "...most cases of disappearances are to be ascribed to members of the military, the police and vigilante groups...the government CAFGUs and, to a lesser extent, civilian volunteer groups should be added." This was further corroborated in a separate study conducted by Amnesty International, which concluded that in most cases, victims who subsequently "reappeared" were held in custody by either military or police authorities from a period of one week to two months.


Poetic In-justice

Ironically, despite the past and present commission of enforced disappearances, the Philippines itself has been a party to a number of international treaties and agreements designed to promote and protect basic human rights. The most prominent is the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assemble on on December 10, 1948 and to which the Philippines in one of the first signatories.

The country was also a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which states, among other things, that "all persons shall not be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment" (Article 7). It also stipulates that "no one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law" (Article 9). The Covenant further guarantees that "anyone who has been the victim of unlawful arrest or detention shall have an enforceable right to compensation" and that "everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law" (Article 16).

It did not even oppose the adoption of the UN Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances when it was presented to the UN General Assembly on December 18, 1992. Because of its stance, the government is thus bound to "take effective legislative, administrative, judicial and other measures to prevent and terminate enforced or involuntary disappearance in any territory under its jurisdiction" as stipulated in Article III. Article XIV also mandates that those suspected of perpetrating an enforced disappearance shall "be brought before competent civil authorities of the State for the purpose of prosecution and trial" and that "all States should take any lawful and appropriate action available to them to bring all persons presumed responsible for an act of enforced disappearance found to be within their jurisdiction or within their control, to justice."

In December of last year, the country also ratified the Rome Statute Establishing the International Criminal Court - a judicial body under the auspices of the United Nations which has the power to hear and decide cases involving genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, aggression and enforced or involuntary disappearances which have been committed within the territory of the State parties.

Given these precedents, the Philippine government therefore has rescinded on its international obligations, signing documents left and right only to pay lip service later on.


One Step-Forward, Two Steps Backward

Though the Marcos regime has become synonymous with human rights violations, the incidence of disappearances has not been mitigated even after his ouster from power and the subsequent restoration of democratic rule. Under his immediate successors Corazon Aquino for example, the number reported cases of involuntary disappearances has reached 830, far exceeding the levels during the Martial Law period. And while involuntary disappearances have markedly declined in recent years, with 66 cases recorded during Ramos's incumbency and with at least 27 instances committed under the Estrada administration, the total number of 1,682 is still relatively high within the context of the Asian region. Moreover, of these figures, only 35 have so far been exhumed while a very small number have resurfaced alive. The fate of the rest, however, remains uncertain.

To remedy the situation, then President Corazon Aquino formed the Presidential Commission on Human Rights (PCHR) shortly after her assumption to power in 1986 to investigate various cases of violations involving political rights. Headed by well-respected Senator and street parliamentarian the late Jose "Pepe" Diokno, the PCHR was transformed into an independent quasi-judicial constitutional body in 1987. Dubbed as the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and with 13 regional offices through out the country, its expanded mandate includes civil, economic and socio-cultural rights.

Despite its noble intentions however, the Commission has been hampered by severe institutional limitations. While it may investigate cases of human rights violations and recommend the same to the Department of Justice (DOJ) or to the Office of the Ombudsman, the CHR lacks any prosecutory power of its own. Because of this impediment, most witnesses are wary of identifying themselves, since they are not given the proper protection that can only be accorded by a proper court of law.

This however, does not mean that reforms and improvements are in the offing. Under the Ramos administration, a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was singed between the Justice Department and the Commission on Human Rights allowing the latter to serve as a collaborating counsel along with DOJ lawyers in the prosecution of human rights -related cases. Several moves in Congress have also been made which seek to grant prosecutory powers to CHR. To further beef up these efforts, former President Ramos also formed, through an executive order the "Task Force Disappearance". Spearheaded by the CHR, the Task Force includes the DOJ, the PNP, the AFP and various human rights NGOs. The undertaking, however, proved nothing. this, according to most NGOs, was due to the fact that the AFP and PNP were part of the initiative, which were the most notorious institutions suspected of committing human rights violations.

Yet, despite its lack of success, parallel efforts were also made at the legislative department, with Senator Sergio Osmeņa III and Representative Bonifacio Gillego filing a resolution calling on the Philippine government to ratify the UN Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances. Another resolution was also submitted supporting Amnesty International's 14 Point Program for the Prevention of "Disappearances". These measures however, were merely passed by the committee and were not approved by the plenary.

More so, Congress through the initiative of AFAD Chairperson Edcel C. Lagman, in 1993 had allocated P4 million ($153,000) for the welfare and rehabilitation of families affected by involuntary disappearances as well as the surviving victims. This was then increased to P5 million ($193,000) in subsequent annual budgets. This allocation however is subject to a very stringent colatilla, with the burden of proof placed squarely on the shoulders of the victims' families, most of whom are deprived of the most basic access to the prescribed legal requirements that would prove both the disappearance and their level of kinship with the disappeared.

Civil society groups have also made significant contributions in the over-all effort. The Families of Victims of Involuntary Disappearances (FIND) for example, has been active in data-gathering and in its numerous support programs. it also involved in organizing forensic search missions in order to locate, identify and recover the remains of the dead desaparecidos. Unfortunately, its work has also been met by severe difficulties. Most often, witnesses are fearful of coming out in the open lest they suffer from possible reprisal from those responsible for the atrocities. There were also cases wherein the victim's remains were removed from the burial site shortly before exhumation.

But what would probably the most difficult problem of FIND and all other human rights groups is that until now, most perpetrators remain unpunished. The extent of impunity in the Philippines has been so great that it was even noted by the UNWGEID. From 1987 to 1990 for example, the CHR received 7,944 complaints of human rights violations. of this number 1,509 cases were filed in court and only 11 cases yielded punishment against the offenders. Furthermore in the 1998 Report of the UNWGEID, the Philippine government sought the deletion of 49 cases in the former's list of desaparecidos and another 350 cases to be reviewed by the military - the very institution that was primarily involved in most (if not all) of these abductions.

To make matters worse, only a small number of families have so far benefited from financial assistance program given by government (which approximately P10,000 or $200 per family). As of this writing, approximately 300 families were given financial assistance and more are still awaiting justice.


Uncanny Twist

The phenomenon of involuntary disappearance however, had a very uncanny twist with the election of Joseph Ejercito Estrada to the presidency in 1998. A former movie actor turned politician, Erap (as he is called by most Filipinos) was able to successfully mix presidential reverence with pop icon fanaticism -  a trait that is so common among the stars and bigwigs of the silverscreen. Turning his legions of adorning fans into a solid electoral base, Estrada was able to defeat other seasoned politicians though sheer imagery and a populist dose of pro-poor rhetoric, charging his campaign with the slogan "Erap Para sa Mahirap (Erap for the Poor)".

Yet even before the start of the traditional 100-day honeymoon between the newly elected Chief Executive and Philippine media, Estrada was already embroiled in an ugly controversy, after giving the go-signal for the burial of former President Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani (Heroes' Grave). Angering and galvanizing activists, civil society groups and the human rights victims of the former dictator, Erap soon relented after a series of mass actions and demonstrations in the capital.

A year later, the Estrada government was again at loggerheads with various progressive groups when Malacaņang tried to amend the Constitution to allow foreign corporations to own land and media establishments in the Philippines. Dubbed as CONCORD (Constitutional Corrections for Reform and Development), the project was subsequently put to the backburner after waves of protests and dipping presidential popularity.

But learning his bag of tricks from the movie industry, Erap soon made a big production a la Robert de Niro's Wag the Dog to arrest his plunging approval rating. Using the breakdown of the on-going peace-talks with the secessionist Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) as a justification, Estrada soon launched an all-out military offensive in Mindanao, killing scores of people and damaging lives and property worth millions. After overrunning the main rebel base Camp Abubakar, the President and his hordes celebrated their victory by treating themselves to a sumptuous feast of beer and lechon (roasted pork) as television cameras recorded their gluttonous glee, to the consternation of civil society leaders and to the indignation of the Muslim community.

though his punitive actions have nonetheless earned for him a few popularity points, these were soon put to naught however with the jueteng-gate scandal in October 2000, courtesy of former presidential booze and Ilocos Sur Governor Luis "Chavit" Singson. Claiming that the President has received P200 million in payola money from illegal numbers game, Singson's expose triggered a series of demonstrations demanding Estrada's resignation and impeachment trial that was televised live from the Senate, transforming an otherwise esoteric legal proceeding into the nation's leading telenovela.

It was under these circumstances that most celebrated case of involuntary disappearance under the Estrada administration was carried out, presumably by operatives of the Philippine National Police (PNP) and the Presidential Anti-Organized Crime Task Force (PAOCTF). A known PR Consultant and an estranged friend of Estrada, Salvador "Bubby" Dacer and his driver Emmanuel Corbito were abducted on November 24, just 13 days prior to the formal opening of the impeachment trial, as he was allegedly on the way to meet Erap's predecessor Fidel Ramos and hand over vital documents that would prove the President's guilt. Though their vehicle was soon found at the foot of a ravine in Maragondon, Cavite three days after the abduction, their whereabouts remain a mystery up to this day.


After the Rndgame: Qou Vadis?

While many have expected that the impeachment trial would go until the 12th of February, no one foresaw that the entire proceeding would come to an abrupt end on January 16, after the administration-dominated Senate disallowed the opening of a sealed enveloped allegedly containing bank records showing that Estrada had indeed amassed P3.3 billion in a  secrete account with Equitable PCI Bank. With the populace suddenly losing confidence in the impeachment proceedings, they spontaneously took to the streets that led to the Second People Power Revolution.

As the crowd in EDSA (the site of the first People Power Revolution in 1986) reached more than a million plus, with simultaneous protest movements through out the country, the morale and confidence of the military in their Commander-in-Chief began to deteriorate, leading the Armed Forces top to brass to declare their withdrawal of support to the administration on January19. By the following day, Estrada left Malacaņang and his Vice-President and former presidential daughter Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was sworn in as the country's 14th President in an atmosphere reminiscent of Marcos' fall from power 15 years ago.

yet, as the euphoria dies down the sense of revolutionary upsurge begins to ebb away, the new government would have to go to work and face the same pressing concerns that have been left in total disarray by the previous administration. With 1,682 cases of disappearances at the disposal of the courts, the petite, female President would have to dig deep into the past in order to make a fresh new start. For it would take earnestness , a sense of urgency and doggedness in the search for justice and truth, more that a photogenic face and a near reverent surname, to vanquish the poltergeists of the past. Otherwise, the eerie silence that has since descended upon  Katipunan  Road will remain forever oblivious to din and shouts of a jubilant mob gathered at a stretch of cement and dirt called EDSA.

 


VOICE Maiden Issue 2001

 

Copyright 2008  AFAD - Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances
Web Design by: www.listahan.org